[Bf-docboard] Script Licensing

[joe]

GPL sounds like an overly restrictive license for every script though
(especially little cookbook scripts).  What about a choice of GPL, LGPL, BSD
and zlib licenses?

Joe

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Matt Ebb <matt at mke3.net> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:53 AM, joe <joeedh at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hrm.  You could try contacting some admins.  We went with OCL because the
> > manual is OCL, and it seemed to make sense (as back then the wiki was
> > primarily for user documentation/developer documents).
>
> Right, it was all about the old 2.3 manual, which was OCL. Anyway, is
> there any reason at all why the contents of the entire wiki must be
> licensed the same? Why not just state: 'open content, unless otherwise
> stated on the page itself' or even something more restrictive like:
> 'open content, unless otherwise declared as GPL on the page itself' or
> 'open content, with the exception of GPL for all contained
> program/script code'
>
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-docboard mailing list
> Bf-docboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20080607/65d3010b/attachment.htm