<div dir="ltr"><div>In the meantime Thomas an me agreed on IRC that we should just do it. So let's just switch. <br><br>As it's only a default setting I don't feel strongly for or against it anyway - my point was just to raise awareness for an important missing feature that can't be faked easily with cycles and to get the info if there was a defined list of features that we have to complete before switching.<br>
</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-06-20 3:07 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Williamson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jonathan@montagestudio.org" target="_blank">jonathan@montagestudio.org</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I also completely agree. BI is still there and available for people that need and or have certain requirements. But I don't believe those requirements apply to the mass majority of users, at least not initially. Just look at any gallery, the majority of images are submitted are rendered with Cycles now. Those that are not tend to be by advanced artists that have specific needs (such as NPR, motion graphics, etc). </div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span><div class="gmail_extra"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr">Jonathan Williamson<div><a href="http://cgcookie.com" target="_blank">http://cgcookie.com</a></div></div>
</div></font></span><div><div class="h5">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Agustin Benavidez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:agustinbenavidez@gmail.com" target="_blank">agustinbenavidez@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Well, defining feature complete could be tricky, Cycles could lack of Env light on shadows but BI lacks of global illumination, I seriously think global illumination is quite more relevant when we are enumerating features and which one is more important to most users.</div>
<div><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-06-19 17:05 GMT-03:00 Nazim Mer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nazim.mer@gmail.com" target="_blank">nazim.mer@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div><p dir="ltr">+1 to cycles as defualts </p>
<p dir="ltr">BUT i still think BI should always be in blender especially since it has no affect on blenders ovveral performance......</p>
<p dir="ltr">And its great for those quick renders especially when combined with cycles baking</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p><span><font color="#888888">
<p dir="ltr">Nazim Mer<br>
</p>
</font></span><br></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
Bf-cycles mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org" target="_blank">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bf-cycles mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org" target="_blank">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bf-cycles mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><p>------<br>
Plasmasolutions<br>
Design | Development | Training</p>
<p>Website: <a href="http://www.plasmasolutions.de/" target="_blank">Http://www.plasmasolutions.de</a><br>
Blog: <a href="http://blog.plasmasolutions.de/" target="_blank">Http://blog.plasmasolutions.de</a></p>
<p>Telefon: <a value="+4917620179565">0176 2017 9565</a></p>
</div>