<div dir="ltr">Hi Thomas,<br><br>I'm quite unsure about this. I really love Cycles but its current lack of a proper shadow catcher & the missing env light support in the shadow pass (that is absolutely necessary for serious compositing work is making me doubt) if we should do that already. If we like to make the switch when we are "production" ready then I would vote against the change. If we can live with compositing artists biting in the desk when it comes to compositing live action with Cycles I'd say look if we can implement a shadow catcher first.<br>
<br><div>I am teaching Cycles often but I would never stop to teach BI as well as it's a very fast (esp. for MoGraph) and decent renderer if you know which knobs to turn. It may be harder for beginners but I would vote for the change only if we are feature complete. For me and my compositing buddies (and I'm sure Sebastian is screaming out loud here too) is a proper shadow pass support (including environment lighting, shadow catcher) a show stopper.<br>
<br></div><div>Many greetings, Thomas<br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-06-19 18:53 GMT+02:00 Gottfried Hofmann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gottfried@blenderdiplom.com" target="_blank">gottfried@blenderdiplom.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
using Cycles as the default engine would really help newbies, so +1<br>
I stoppped teaching BI about one year ago...<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Gottfried<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On 06/19/2014 06:51 PM, Thomas Dinges wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
> I think it's time to make Cycles the default engine in Blender. This has<br>
> been discussed a few times already, and the argument was to wait until<br>
> we have Volume/Smoke etc..<br>
> Now that we do, it's time to act. :)<br>
><br>
> 1) Any open issues?<br>
> Sergey fixed some remaining issues with Preview Rendering for Brushes<br>
> etc, while Cycles is the active engine. Are there any other problems<br>
> that need to be addressed?<br>
><br>
> 2) Presets<br>
> I think we should have some presets, at least a "Standard Surface" for<br>
> Beginners. Brecht made a quick hack for that a while back, I think<br>
> having bundled Node Groups is still the way to go.<br>
> <a href="https://developer.blender.org/D474" target="_blank">https://developer.blender.org/D474</a><br>
><br>
> I would like to do the move for Blender 2.72 (upcoming Release).<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Thomas<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Bf-cycles mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
--- BlenderDiplom.com ---<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Bf-cycles mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><p>------<br>
Plasmasolutions<br>
Design | Development | Training</p>
<p>Website: <a href="http://www.plasmasolutions.de/" target="_blank">Http://www.plasmasolutions.de</a><br>
Blog: <a href="http://blog.plasmasolutions.de/" target="_blank">Http://blog.plasmasolutions.de</a></p>
<p>Telefon: <a value="+4917620179565">0176 2017 9565</a></p>
</div>