<p dir="ltr">But i really mean about the way that cycles process de model. I dont have any knowledge about raytracing render, but i am shocked about how the new hardware know improve so much rhe rendering, even when they have 5 time more cores.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 28 Mar 2014 23:11, "Brecht Van Lommel" <<a href="mailto:brechtvanlommel@pandora.be">brechtvanlommel@pandora.be</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
There are various possibilities:<br>
<br>
* Memory and texture memory read/write bottlenecks<br>
* Different Mhz for cores<br>
* Different GPU architecture<br>
* Not all cores occupied due to divergence or mismatched batch sizes<br>
* CPU Overhead<br>
<br>
There's too many interacting parts to be sure without closely investigating.<br>
<br>
Brecht.<br>
<br>
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:30 PM, GeKo <<a href="mailto:geko.pua@gmail.com">geko.pua@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Short question, Why the execution time don't decrease "linearly" according<br>
> to the number of cuda cores?<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Bf-cycles mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bf-cycles mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br>
</blockquote></div>