<p dir="ltr">You forgot to attach the images or attachments are not supported. Either way you are better of hosting them on a site like <a href="http://pasteall.org">pasteall.org</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">-- cheers</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 3, 2013 5:24 PM, "franco cortesi" <<a href="mailto:cortesi_8@hotmail.com">cortesi_8@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div dir="ltr">
I was playing with blender lux and mitsuba using film curves for a vintage style just on clay renders and i found very tricky to get same results with cycles renders principally because of the sky. U<span style="font-size:10pt">sing curves like ektchachrome or kodachrome wich gives drastic color changes, cycles rendered skys turns orange/red very easy while lux/mitsuba remains "photograpic".</span><div>
<br><br>so rendering the same scene in cycles/lux/mitsuba gives these attached images. Also i found every cycles render brighter than mitsuba/lux but as they are all unbiased or accurate, should look the same i guess..? probably the answer is in the brighter sky?</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>some googling:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://libregraphicsworld.org/blog/entry/luxrender-makes-use-of-new-realistic-sky-dome-model" target="_blank">http://libregraphicsworld.org/blog/entry/luxrender-makes-use-of-new-realistic-sky-dome-model</a></div>
<div><br><br></div> </div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bf-cycles mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>