Sorry for so much mail, but here are the tests summarized in image form. Really, the patch makes MB usable. Currently, I'd prefer Full Sampled Motionblur over what's in trunk.<br><br>Test1:<br><br>SVN:<br><img alt="Inline image 1" src="http://i.imgur.com/V5njD.png"><br>
<br>Patch:<br><img alt="Inline image 2" src="http://i.imgur.com/pwusI.png"><br><br>Test2:<br><br>SVN:<br><img alt="Inline image 3" src="http://i.imgur.com/J5VX1.png"><br><br>Patch:<br><img alt="Inline image 4" src="http://i.imgur.com/urMKs.png"><br>
<br><br>Test3:<br><br>SVN:<br><img alt="Inline image 5" src="http://i.imgur.com/kmrXy.png"><br><br>Patch:<br><img alt="Inline image 6" src="http://i.imgur.com/h89D6.png"><br><br><br>The only time that trunk performed properly was in Test 2. The other two times it was completely wrong.<br>
<br>This seems like an obvious decision to me, but I may be missing something. Ultimately you should pick the solution that is the most correct since currently we don't have a perfect solution. Please let me know of corner cases where the patch would cause problems so I can update my regression file.<br>
<br>-NateW<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Nate Wiebe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:natewiebe13@gmail.com" target="_blank">natewiebe13@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Here is a quick blend I set up with 3 tests. They are in different scenes. With the patch, they all perform like I would expect.<br>
<br>Blend: <a href="http://www.pasteall.org/blend/17424" target="_blank">http://www.pasteall.org/blend/17424</a><br>
<br>-NateW<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nate Wiebe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:natewiebe13@gmail.com" target="_blank">natewiebe13@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">storms change does fix that weird blur problem when rotating around an object (bug #32974). I did a couple tests and it did seem to give better results. Are there any cases where the proposed patch gives bad results?<div>
<div><br><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:58 PM, storm <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kartochka22@yandex.ru" target="_blank">kartochka22@yandex.ru</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I get it, but my little scene looks more correct with that "fix", maybe<br>
because changing only w in 4D projective space will make strange big<br>
blur along axis ? Maybe do not touch "decompose.y" at all?<br>
<br>
В Вс., 11/11/2012 в 04:07 +0100, Brecht Van Lommel пишет:<br>
<div>> quick arc-length parametrization of the curve<br>
<br>
<br>
</div><a href="http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/12186/arc-length-of-bezier-curves" target="_blank">http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/12186/arc-length-of-bezier-curves</a><br>
<br>
Really hard task, elliptic integrals, something that i prefer to skip :P<br>
<div><div><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bf-cycles mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org" target="_blank">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles" target="_blank">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>