<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/>
 <style type="text/css">.mceResizeHandle {position: absolute;border: 1px solid black;background: #FFF;width: 5px;height: 5px;z-index: 10000}.mceResizeHandle:hover {background: #000}img[data-mce-selected] {outline: 1px solid black}img.mceClonedResizable, table.mceClonedResizable {position: absolute;outline: 1px dashed black;opacity: .5;z-index: 10000}
.mceResizeHandle {position: absolute;border: 1px solid black;background: #FFF;width: 5px;height: 5px;z-index: 10000}.mceResizeHandle:hover {background: #000}img[data-mce-selected] {outline: 1px solid black}img.mceClonedResizable, table.mceClonedResizable {position: absolute;}

  
  </style></head><body style="">
 
  
 
 
  <div>
   &#160;
  </div> 
  <div> 
   <p>Hi,&#160;</p> 
   <p>this is an update to my previous email (below)</p> 
   <p>Has anyone noticed that 2.64 64bit GPU renders are slower than 2.63 64bit GPU? Or is it some quirk on of my system?&#160;</p> 
   <p>EVGA GTX460 2GB (with latest driver)</p> 
   <p>Compared 3 builds/releases of Blender 2.64 using these benchmarks: &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;</p> 
   <p>#1 &#160; http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?239480-2-61-Cycles-render-benchmark&#38;highlight=benchmark</p> 
   <p>#2 &#160;http://benchmark.cd3dtech.com/Benchmark/benchmark.html</p> 
   <p>&#160;</p> 
   <p>2.63a r46461:46487M &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 6:22 &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;1:13</p> 
   <p>&#34;Fastest CUDA&#34; r51640 &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 8:15 &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;1:37</p> 
   <p>Blender.org 2.64a &#160;r51232 &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;8:08 &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;2:01</p> 
   <p>Buildbot.com r51641 &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;8:16 &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;1:37</p> 
   <p>Note, &#160;rendered 1x1 tiles per Adriano Oliveira&#39;s suggestion for faster time......8x8 rendered in 14min 22sec.&#160;</p> 
   <p>Please let me know if this is a known issue, or if you need me to test more builds/releases.&#160;</p> 
   <p>Thanks,&#160;<br/>Cal &#160;McGaugh</p> 
   <p>www.blenderportal.com&#160;</p> 
   <p>&#160;</p> 
  </div> 
  <div>
   &#160;
  </div> 
  <div>
   &#160;
  </div> 
  <div>
   &#160;
  </div> 
  <div>
   &#160;
  </div> 
  <div>
   <br/>---------- Original Message ----------
   <br/>From: Cal McGaugh &#60;cal@cal3d.com&#62;
   <br/>To: bf-cycles@blender.org
   <br/>Date: October 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM
   <br/>Subject: Cycles 2.64 GPU 2X slower???
  </div> 
  <div style="position: relative;"> 
   <div>
    Hi,
   </div> 
   <div>
    &#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    &#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    using 
    <a target="_blank" href="http://benchmark.cd3dtech.com/Benchmark/benchmark.html">this benchmark</a>, &#160; Cycles 2.64 r51291-mingw64 &#160;renders in 14min 22sec
   </div> 
   <div>
    &#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    Cycles 2.64 2.64.5 &#34;Fastest build (All CUDA kernels) &#160;renders in 14min 58sec.&#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    &#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    <strong>But 2.63 r46461:46487M renders in 6min 22sec</strong> .........what&#39;s up???
   </div> 
   <div>
    &#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    Just thought someone should know about it.&#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    &#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    Cheers,&#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    Cal&#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    &#160;
   </div> 
   <div>
    &#160;
   </div> 
  </div>
 
</body></html>