<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt">Hi Brecht,<div style="font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><span></span><div id="yiv1755297376"><div><div style="color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt;"><div><br><span></span></div><div><span>Now you have switched to Static BVH for full renders, why do some of surfaces in a scene I am working on for my BA (Hons) render as black, while they render fine with Dynamic BVH?</span></div><div><br></div><div>Have checked surface normals and they are facing out.<br>Tried attaching a couple of small file screen captures <span style="font-style: italic;">(around 200 KB)</span> each but they were still to large for the mailing list.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><span
style="font-weight:bold;">On a different subject</span> (should I ask as a separate subject?)<br><span></span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span></span><span>Thinking ahead... Will you be adding a method for clay renders?</span></div><div><span>Using the unfinished OpenCL for clay renders has been very useful for degree work, without
having to edit all objects materials.</span><span> If you will be adding a Clay option, will it use current scene lights, or just environment lighting, like the idea current scene lighting.<br></span></div><div><br><span></span></div><div><span>Thank you kindly for your time</span><span>,</span></div><div><br><span></span></div><div><span>David</span></div><div><br></div><div style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt;"><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Brecht Van Lommel <brechtvanlommel@pandora.be><br><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span></b> bf-cycles@blender.org<br><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span></b> Friday, 4 November 2011, 16:37<br><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [Bf-cycles] Rendering with Static BVH
Only<br></font><br>You're right, I thought it was using static already but it seems it's<br>not, fixed in svn now.<br><br>Brecht.<br><br>On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Daniel Salazar - 3Developer.com<br><<a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:zanqdo@gmail.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:zanqdo@gmail.com">zanqdo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Just a question, does it make sense that rendering a frame or an animation<br>> uses your dynamic or static BVH setting? shouldn't it only do static since<br>> it's faster?<br>> cheers<br>> Daniel Salazar<br>> 3Developer.com<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Bf-cycles mailing list<br>> <a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br>> <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br>><br>><br>_______________________________________________<br>Bf-cycles mailing list<br><a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:Bf-cycles@blender.org">Bf-cycles@blender.org</a><br><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles">http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles</a><br><br><br></div></div></div></div></div><br><br></div></div></div></body></html>