[Bf-committers] Module Owner List

pete larabell xgl.asyliax at gmail.com
Wed Dec 29 19:23:19 CET 2010


Yeah!

I currently have both i386 and amd64 builds working, so when the word for
2.56 goes out, so long as I know what rev. to compile, I'd be more than
happy to provide them.

:) :) :)

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Thomas Dinges <blender at dingto.de> wrote:

> Hey Pete,
> sure there is no reason why we should not also have official FreeBSD
> Releases!
>
> Thomas
>
> Am 28.12.2010 19:09, schrieb pete larabell:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Just curious as to whether there is enough need (want) for FreeBSD builds
> > that you'd like someone to do official builds, or shall that just be left
> to
> > graphicall.org uploads?
> >
> > I built the 2.55 for FreeBSD i386 and amd64 architectures but didn't get
> a
> > response yet about 2.56 when I inquired about not seeing FreeBSD on the
> list
> > of platform builders being asked if they were ready/able to do 2.56.
> >
> > I checked the ModulesOwners to see if FreeBSD was listed on Release OSes
> and
> > it wasn't. If there is not enough need for it that's fine, I can just
> post
> > to graphicall, but I'm certainly willing and able to build for official
> > releases too so long as I know in advance that I should be doing it.
> >
> > I know the unofficial title of FreeBSD build maintainer was sorta given
> to
> > Jaevixa McNomera after she started releasing builds in graphicall some
> > months ago, and I offered to pick up the task when she was near fatally
> > injured a couple months ago. I spoke with her about when she'd be back
> and
> > able to resume her role in building these, and her current projected time
> is
> > summer 2011 at the soonest.
> >
> > So basically, if you guys want a FreeBSD guy to do release builds, I'm
> happy
> > to do it. :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Pete
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Thomas Dinges<blender at dingto.de>
>  wrote:
> >
> >> Hey everyone,
> >> for the last few months it was quite unclear, especially for new
> >> developers and patch-submitters who is responsible for a module. That is
> >> now finally solved.
> >>
> >> Ton has reviewed and approved a list, I have made about 1 year ago. This
> >> list was in the wiki and most of the current developers already took a
> >> look at it, so it should be all fine.
> >>
> >> Mindrones made a template of it, so this list can be put into other wiki
> >> pages which is very useful.
> >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners
> >>
> >> It would be cool if everyone could take a look at it again and if there
> >> is something wrong please answer to this mail here on the list.
> >>
> >> You can also checkout the guidelines on how to put this info on wiki
> pages.
> >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners#Guidelines
> >>
> >> Thomas
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bf-committers mailing list
> >> Bf-committers at blender.org
> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-committers mailing list
> > Bf-committers at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>


More information about the Bf-committers mailing list