[Bf-committers] Roadmap 2.5 proposal

[Tom M]

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Matt Ebb <matt at mke3.net> wrote:
> Like cam says, some options are:
> A) we can call it 2.50 (and then have to explain that it's part of a
> bigger 2.5 series, and that it's really not a final release, and blah
> blah blah), which has a high potential for people to misunderstand/
> misinterpret/not even read lengthy explanations.
> B) or we can call it something obvious like "2.50 beta" or "test1" or
> "pr1" , which everyone immediately understands.
>
> I strongly support  B..

I also support option B.

LetterRip