[Bf-committers] While we're talking about naming conventions...

malefico malefico at malefico3d.org
Tue Nov 3 11:51:17 CET 2009


Agree

-1 for renaming layers

Cheers,

malefico.

jmsoler at free.fr wrote:
> -1 for renaming layers.
>
> Selon "Daniel Salazar - 3Developer.com" <zanqdo at gmail.com>:
>
>   
>> You are kidding right? theres far more usages for Layers than related
>> to rendering or visibility and shorten it to some meaningless RVG or
>> what ever is a bad idea. Layers is layers in any 3D software out
>> there.. nothing wrong with that name
>>
>> Daniel Salazar
>> Cel: (506) 8366 8384
>> Offi: (506) 2219 0511
>> www.3developer.com
>>
>>     
>>> +1 for renaming layers. I think "visibility groups" is best, and
>>> "render visibility groups" is fine for the render version. I'd be
>>> happy to shorten this to VGs and RVGs or something like that if the
>>> words themselves seem to long.
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>
>   



More information about the Bf-committers mailing list