[Bf-committers] Subversion <-> CVS
John K. Walton
bf-committers@blender.org
Thu, 6 May 2004 06:53:11 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Alexander Ewering wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 May 2004, Ton Roosendaal wrote:
>
> > - is the migration from CVS to Subversion 100% noob resistant? This
> > means that doing a checkout, an update, a diff and a commit is just as
> > simple as before?
> > - does it require additional software to be installed locally?
> > - are here *active* members of the current developers team experienced
> > with it, and also at admin level for Subversion?
> > - can anyone simply tell me what - for our daily coding practice -
> > Subversion would offer extra?
>
> - does it really make sense to replace a running system?
> - why is the idea of replacing cvs (that's almost as standard as
> christianity and jesus) suddenly brought up? Is CVS not
> suitable for the task? Do other projects not use CVS?
>
> Same thing I think about scons sometimes...
>
> Just a suggestion and my personal opinion... stop "changing a running
> system"...
i agree with alex. spend time on features rather than infrastructure.
lot of time was wasted on autoconf.
> | alexander ewering instinctive new media
> | ae[@]instinctive[.]de http://www[.]instinctive[.]de
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers@blender.org
> http://www.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>