[Bf-committers] suzanne award 2

[Tomas Golembiovsky]

This sounds quite good.

(But it's pity that I cannot win anything, because I'm new here, maybe 
next year :)

Ton Roosendaal wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Apparantly everyone bothers most about if they can actually win the  award!
> But I still need a solid decision process. It is pretty hard to make an  
> award based at "best Blender feature"... since sometimes more people  
> worked on it, and the list of features easily grows huge, making it  
> hard to find the good nominees.
> 
> What about this approach:
> 
> - The award will be named "Best coding contribution '02/'03".
> - only contributions for open source blender until (including) 2.28a
>   (What people work on now can be included in awards for next year)
> 
> The first voting procedure:
> 
> - We'll use the 'peer rating' ranking at projects.blender.org
> - Each developer can set individually if they want to join this rating.  
> If you don't join, you cannot vote either. I've excluded myself already  
> from ratings.
> - The ranking result won't be visible for the duration of the voting.
> - I will indicate at the projects site that rating is used now for the  
> awards.
> - voting stops oct 15.
> 
> The top five rated will become official nominees. During the conference  
> the participants will get a voting ballot with the names of nominees on  
> it. At the site the nominees get a small text about what they've  
> contributed.
> 
> Is this acceptable?
> 
> -Ton-
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --
> Ton Roosendaal  Blender Foundation ton@blender.org  http://www.blender.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers@blender.org
> http://www.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> 
> 

-- 

Tomas Golembiovsky

------------------------
WEB: nyoxi.mysteria.cz
ICQ: 346980487
------------------------------------------------------------

Murphy's Law

If it can go wrong, it will go wrong.